I
recently watched this year’s National Geographic Bee that I recorded on
my DVR, inspiring me to reminisce and write about my experiences at the
2009 GeoBee, as well as my observations on this year’s competition. I
can say that a lot of things about the competition have changed, but if
there’s one thing that’s remained static since 2009 (and possibly
throughout the entire history of the competition), it’s the contestants’
continued enthusiasm and passion about geography.
The GeoBee 2.0
Some things I immediately
noticed were the new electronic displays, which replaced the previous
letter cut-outs against a backlight. But the Grosvenor Auditorium wasn’t
the only thing refurbished, as a new scoring system was put into
effect.
This year, National
Geographic did away with the long-standing two-strike rule for
elimination in favor of a scoring system similar to that of the National
Geographic World Championship. Questions are now worth a certain value
of points, differing by round and type of question. In addition, if a
contestant answers correctly, then a set amount of points is added to
their score, with no deductions for wrong answers.
Sometimes, a question came
with multiple clues or various views of one map, albeit with the
trade-off of less points for each clue or map used. Oftentimes, they
also came with a bonus question related to the answer choices, although
it came with the risk of losing one point if answered incorrectly.
In total, there were fourteen
rounds of questions this year, and the contestants with the two lowest
scores were eliminated from the competition at the end of rounds 5, 9,
12, and 14. The two remaining contestants then square off in a
championship round with five regular questions and multiple tiebreaker
questions, with one point per question. If a winner is not determined by
the end for the first five questions, the round goes into sudden death,
with the first to answer incorrectly relegated to second place.
The Competition
The Top Ten finalists
included veterans Vansh Jain of Wisconsin, Anthony Cheng of Utah, and
Karthik Karnik of Massachusetts, as well as Neelam Sandhu of New
Hampshire, the younger sister of another successful GeoBee finalist
Milan Sandhu, among others. They endured fourteen intense rounds of
questioning, demonstrating their knowledge on topics related to the
habitats of a species of lemur, the origins of a traditional Indian
dance, and the site of the Titanic shipwreck — all with sufficient
geographical clues, of course! (I have personally known Vansh from my
time at the GeoBee, as well as Milan from being teammates at the 2009
National Geographic World Championship in Mexico.)
After the dust settled,
14-year-old Rahul Nagvekar of Texas emerged victorious, claiming the
grand prize: a $25,000 scholarship, a lifetime membership to the
National Geographic Society, and an all-expenses paid trip to the
Galapagos Islands. Vansh Jain finished second, and California’s Varun
Mahadevan took third.
As a former National
Geographic Bee contestant, I thought this year’s questions were slightly
easier (just my opinion since the questions that stumped me in 2009
might be easier for others) than 2009’s (in which I placed 5th in the
Nationals), although the championship round questions were still very
tough. In addition, I thought the new system was an improvement from the
previous two-strike rule, providing more opportunities that future
finalists can use to their advantage.
“One and Done” at the GeoBee
I was at a disadvantage when
it came to preparing for the GeoBee. My elementary school never
participated in the GeoBee or any other academic competitions, and when I
entered middle school, I was immediately promoted to 8th grade, making
my first (and only) year in middle school the only opportunity I had to
enter the competition. Realizing that I was up against tough and much
more experienced competitors (I was only 11 at the time!), I made the
most out of that single opportunity, ruling the Michigan State Bee and
eventually reaching 5th place in the National GeoBee’s top ten. (I also
made it to Team USA at the National Geographic World Championship, but
we’ll save that story for another day.)
I prepared (without a coach
or any assistance from the school, except for maybe registering for the
GeoBee ;D) using previous national champion Andrew Wojtanik’s guide Afghanistan to Zimbabwe,
containing comprehensive facts on each country (e.g. major cities,
population, highest and lowest points, major industries), while also
browsing through several atlases for more information on any
geographical feature I came across when reading. In addition, I
also watched DVDs and documentaries about various countries and perused
through travel books and issues of National Geographic magazine.
However, this preparation
didn’t seem like a chore at all. Instead, I viewed it as a chance to
improve my knowledge on something that has fascinated me since my early
days: I have been interested in globes and maps since I was two years
old, and that interest, although not in use right now, still lingers
inside me.
The Fun Times…
Despite getting caught up in
the pressure to strive for the best possible position at the GeoBee, I
still had a lot of fun participating, especially with some of the things
that happened on the side.
I can still remember how
great it felt to have all that pent-up pressure released once I emerged
victorious at the 2009 State Finals at Western Michigan University in
Kalamazoo. Even the ride back home was an awesome moment for me at that
time. Eating a celebratory vanilla ice cream cone from McDonald’s while
listening to Queen and James Taylor, among others, in the car… good
times.
Another one was at the
Nationals an afternoon trip to a small outpost in Maryland, a
half-an-hour drive from Washington, D.C. This rural section of land
contained various playground staples, like tetherball, mini golf, and
basketball. The workers there also served a delectable selection of
comfort food. It was also here where I met for the second time Ken
Jennings of Jeopardy! fame (Fun fact: he later describes me as “four-foot nothing” but “energetic” kid in his book on geography, Maphead, from my exploits on the basketball court).
I spent most of my time there
besting the frustratingly hard but entertaining mini golf course, and
by the time it was time to leave, I was able to sink the golf ball in
two strokes or less. But when I wasn’t playing mini golf, I was hanging
around some of my fellow state finalists or playing basketball with
them. I definitely wasn’t the best basketball player of the bunch, but I
came pretty close, or so I thought.
There was also a really
entertaining trolley tour of Washington, D.C. as well! You know those
double-decker tours they have in New York or San Francisco (complete
with the commentary), right? Well, this comes pretty close to that level
of excitement, even if you do have to stay indoors. We passed by
several notable landmarks, like the Smithsonian Museum, several foreign
embassies, the Marine Corps War Memorial (also known as the Iwo Jima
Memorial), and even the White House! We also shared stories about our
experiences in our respective states’ Finals.
Another bout of fun during my
D.C. trip was the souvenir exchange the night after the National
Geographic Bee. It was interesting and somewhat entertaining to look
through all the trinkets each finalist had to share. For one, the
finalist from West Virginia had samples of coal encased in tiny glass
jars, and many others had small bits of foodstuffs relating to their
local cuisine (as for me, I brought in keychains with the map of
Michigan imprinted on them). Then it got to the point where mostly
everyone started playing catch to distribute their souvenirs (the floor
was carpet, so things wouldn’t break easily) and everything became a
right mess!
And to top it off, the thrill
of meeting Alex Trebek is a sensation that can probably only be topped
by actually winning the National GeoBee. Seriously. How would you react
if you were within a two-meter radius of undoubtedly one of the most
famous people in television history? Funnily, before the preliminary
rounds, I chanced upon Alex Trebek as he was about to enter the National
Geographic Headquarters. When I greeted him, he responded and
mistakenly asked if I was Eric Yang (who went on to become the champion
that year). Maybe it was because Eric used a picture from his younger
years, or because my picture in that year’s book of contestants lacked
those distinctive glasses. What’s even more interesting is that he is
also one of the few people to pronounce my last name correctly on the first attempt.
A Few Memorable Questions
During the school stage of
the GeoBee, we were asked about the location of Appomattox Court House,
the site where Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union. Instead of
responding with “Virginia”, like I should have, I answered with “North
Carolina”. Although I knew at the time that Appomattox was in Virginia, I
mistakenly thought of Guilford Court House, the site of a Revolutionary War battle (which the British won, by the way).
Another important question
for me was my winning question at the 2009 State Finals, which asked to
identify what Asian country was also known by the moniker “Land of the
Morning Calm.” I correctly answered with “South Korea” while my opponent
responded with “Japan”. The funny part is that I didn’t know this
tidbit of trivia until the night before the competition, when my dad told me about various Asian country monikers, such as the “Land of Golden Pagodas”.
During the preliminary rounds
of the national level, contestants were randomly placed into five
groups and were each asked nine questions. I was one of only three
contestants to answer all nine preliminary questions correctly, along
with Illinois’ Siva Gangavarapu and North Carolina’s Shantan Krovvidi,
if my memory serves me right. It was said that because of this, NGC had to change all the final’s questions, thus making the 2009 championship one of the hardest GeoBee finals ever.
Then there were the two questions that eliminated me from the National Geographic Bee: one asking about the site of an ancient relic on a Caribbean island (answered “Hispaniola”; correct answer was “Cuba”) and the next about identifying the city near Laguna Salada, Mexico’s lowest point (didn’t answer in time; correct answer was “Mexicali”). The Laguna Salada question lived on to become an inside joke in the family.
If only they would have asked about latitude/longitude positions of countries and cities, I might have been the champion (just kidding). But here’s a tip for future contestants: read everything on National Geographic’s website, since I was remiss on that one aspect, proving costly in the end.
Drawbacks of the Grade Level Limit
I personally believe that the
ability to participate in the National Geographic Bee should be a
matter of age, not grade level. Students in similar situations shouldn’t
be barred from entering the Bee just because they may already be in
high school at 12 years old. I would have appreciated taking the
opportunities I missed because of my advanced grade level, although I
probably wouldn’t have been around for this year’s Bee.
And for those saying it would be an unfair advantage for those with accelerated courses, I would have to disagree. The questions on each level of competition span a wide array of subjects that it would still be a challenge to study and master them all, no matter what level of education — even high school or higher — you’re at.
And finally…
All other thoughts aside, the
National Geographic Bee has probably taken a turn for the better. This
innovative system transformed the contest so that raw brainpower
wouldn’t be the only thing necessary to emerge victorious. Risk-taking
and sacrifices are now equally important, providing new challenges and
opening new doors for future contestants.
No comments:
Post a Comment